Template talk:Infobox Gallery

Naming
It should probably just be called "Gallery" as it isn't an infobox. -- Fenyx4 (talk) 19:48, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Agreed. --Alianin (talk) 20:17, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Generated with SMW?
Should we make this autogenerated like Denis Loubet? It doesn't have to be a slideshow.
 * Downside: Makes people go to the image pages to add them to the gallery. May be confusing.
 * Upside: Forces people to actually fill out a minimal amount of information about the image they uploaded. -- Fenyx4 (talk) 19:48, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I personally don't like the slideshow for pages and would rather have all the images listed individually. The slideshow would work for something like a spotlight or main page usage.
 * On a related note, we need to flesh out the MediaWiki:Licenses templates. I started on them, but haven't got a chance to get back to it. Proper attribution is extremely important, especially since we're using copyrighted work on the wiki. Once the licenses are good, all the images on the wiki needs to be updated to cite the source. --Alianin (talk) 20:17, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I agree for the most part on not wanting a slideshow. I thought it might be useful on artist pages as they will have a lot of images. But, yeah, most pages shouldn't use the slideshow format.
 * Any thoughts on autogenerating the galleries or not?
 * I'm not good with licenses but once you have the templates I'll gladly help distribute them to the image pages. -- Fenyx4 (talk) 20:27, 25 March 2014 (UTC)


 * I was trying to make this so I could create a gallery at the bottom of each item page somewhat automatically. If you want to fix it to be autogenerated, I'd much appreciate it. --Browncoat Jayson (talk) 20:29, 25 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Ah, I see what you're saying about autogenerating it. I'm good with either method, though I can see the effort it'll take to get the information into the images to make the generator work. I'm leaning towards a manual addition to make it easier on the uploader and article editor. --Alianin (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * For the uploader I think it would actually be easier. Upload the image, include Image. Make sure you add all the pages whose galleries you want it to show up on into the collection parameter. No need to go edit the page(s) you want it to show up on. -- Fenyx4 (talk) 20:42, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for bearing with me while I try to understand. I can actually work that into the license templates I need to create. I'll use the Image template as a basis and get some feedback before doing the rest. Can we do one or the other or both as far as the autogenerator? --Alianin (talk) 20:55, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * No problem. Sorry to jump ahead. I've just been neck deep in SMW. Let me know if you want me to post some tutorial stuff and/or some explanations of what I've already done. (The recipe stuff is frickin' crazy and although it needs to be done it isn't a good place to start learning.)
 * One or the other or both as in slideshow vs. not slideshow? Or as in autogenerated vs. not autogenerated? In either case it can do both. -- Fenyx4 (talk) 21:38, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I meant autogenerated and/or manual. For the template integrating the SMW for the query, check out Template:Fair use image. Feel free to mess with it to integrate the SMW. We can also move that part of the discussion to that template if you'd like. --Alianin (talk) 21:43, 25 March 2014 (UTC)